The literature in science education indicates that teachers do not always feel comfortable in teaching socioscientific issues (SSI) that are infused with several social domains. In order to address this problem in teaching SSI, this study is designed to understand and describe the experiences of a science teacher and a social studies teacher, who collaboratively designed and taught an SSI-based environmental ethics class.
The purpose of this descriptive case study was to portray how a science and a social studies teacher co-design and co-teach an environmental ethics class.The data collection instruments were interviews, observations, and reflective journals. Thematic analysis of the data was made via a qualitative data analysis software.
The findings indicated that both participants criticized the science curriculum for not being able to address every dimension of SSI. Therefore, they structured their environmental ethics class based on the 'triple bottom idea' in order to look at those issues from social, economic, and environmental points of view. One of the highlights of their Environmental Ethics class was the opportunity given to the students to work in the projects they felt passionate about. The participants described their role in the environmental ethics class as consulting which was different from traditional settings. Therefore, they were not the providers of content anymore, but consulted their students to explore their vested interests.
Implications for Research and Practice:
Giving students power to choose their own project topics, the teachers aimed at enhancing the motivation of students in taking pro-environmental actions, as well as having their own perspective about controversial SSI. Considering the community involvement of the students, this missing piece of students' community involvement and agency in most educational settings was strongly present in the environmental ethics class.
Keywords: environmental ethics, case study, community involvement, service learning projects